Distribution Of Condoms In High Schools Essay

The debate on this topic is two sided, the first being that the jump from high school to the NBA should not be allowed and the second being that they should be able to do what they want....

Should condoms be distributed in schools

Should condoms be distributed in public high schools

Sex Education: Should Condoms Be Distributed in Schools

Tactic 1: Broaden the debate

Lamont's audience that day included gay and lesbian teachers, as well as an"adjustment counselor" and a school librarian.

Lamont gave them an "umbrella" talking point he said was developedwith the help of the National Education Association: "Addressing anti-LGBTharassment in schools creates safer and better schools for students."

Teachers were advised how to use that talking point to justify things such aspro-gay curricula and GLSEN's student clubs.

But one gay activist in the audience objected: Why do we have to give in to the"other side's" argument by putting the emphasis on "all"students? Why can't we just be up front about wanting to focus on gays andlesbian kids?

Lamont's response was revealing: Most students in GLSEN's 3,000 clubs areactually heterosexual, he said. And the majority of complaints regardinghomosexual-related harassment come from "straight" kids.
So, "use this tactic of broadening" to "every child," hesaid.

It's a smart strategy: Not only does it mask the fact that there aren't enoughgay students to warrant the immersion of entire student bodies in pro-gaypropaganda, but it also gives GLSEN convenient heterosexual student"allies" who put themselves in the role of defending perceived gay"victims."

How to respond:

As good as this tactic is, it's still possible for parents to counteract itby exposing it as a Trojan horse, said Caleb Price, a research analyst for Focuson the Family.

"Make it a fairness issue," he advised. "While it's true thatevery child needs a safe school, there's no need to create a special class ofcitizens who get more protection than others. Parents can point out thatapproximately 80 percent of school kids experience some form of bullying atschool -- so why not give attention to all children who need protection --including those who are overweight, wear glasses, etc."

. . . .

Even Brenda High, whose son committed suicide after being bullied, has opposedsafe-school policies that create special categories for homosexuals.

"The efforts to include definitions of classes of victims, also excludesother victims, making it more difficult to protect kids," shesaid.

Parents can also expose GLSEN's true agenda -- one of its student manuals, forexample, mentions getting homosexual themes "fully integrated intocurricula across a variety of subject areas and grade levels."

Tactic 2: Make it personal

Lamont also revealed that GLSEN put together focus groups of kids todetermine which messages resonated most powerfully.

The conclusion? Moms and dads have the most influence. After that, "themost effective tactic proved to be personalization" -- i.e., stories kidshear from their peers or other people who are personally affected byhomosexuality.

To illustrate the point, Lamont related what happened when researchers showedthe group a video featuring Judy Shepard, whose son, Matthew, was murdered in1998 in Wyoming.

"I'm glad I was behind glass, because I almost fell out of my chair,"Lamont said.

The very first comment from a focus group kid was, "How much did that[profanity referring to Judy Shepard] get paid?" Lamont remembered."Because to them it looked like a paid celebrity preaching to them."

But when researchers replaced the video with the "personalization"method, he said, "one of the kids even came out in the focus group."

"Wow, that's powerful," one teacher commented.

Which is why GLSEN is working tirelessly to get gay speakers into publicschools.

How to respond:

If your school invites a homosexual speaker, challenge the school to openthe forum to other perspectives, including ex-gays.

To find local ex-gay speakers, contact Exodus International.

There is solid legal backing for this approach: At least one federal court hasruled that school districts are illegally engaging in "viewpointdiscrimination" by excluding ex-gay and conservative perspectives whenaddressing homosexuality.

Tactic 3: Threaten lawsuits

"This is almost our trump card," Lamont told his audience."Make it a money issue."

When all else fails, he said, threaten a lawsuit. Warn schools they're"legally liable for not protecting young people."

"In all the cases brought, to date, the student either prevailed aftertrial or achieved a settlement," read a handout distributed at theworkshop.

How to respond:

But what GLSEN doesn't tell schools is that, rather than deflectinglawsuits, they may actually become more vulnerable to them by adopting policiesand curricula that single out gay and lesbian individuals, said Mike Johnson,senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal group based inArizona.

"Schools are better off using blanket-protection policies," he said,"that shield all students from bullying or harassment."

The dark side of sexual-orientation policies advocated by GLSEN, Johnson said,is that they often trample on the free-speech rights of students with opposingviewpoints.

"Organizations like the Alliance Defense Fund have won hundreds of freespeech cases nationwide and are willing to stand in the gap for parents,students and school officials," he said.

This Essay Sex Education: Should Condoms Be Distributed in Schools


We are a society that addresses symptoms and not causes. For instance, instead of eating properly and exercising to lose weight, we would rather purchase "fat-trapper pills" and invest in millions of other diet gimmicks. Our search for the easy solution to teenage promiscuity is no different. It is so much less time-consuming, and less embarrassing to advocate "safe" sex through condom distribution than to step back and really examine why teenagers are having sex so early.
I think deep down many know that the reasons go far beyond just hormones, but admitting the true causes requires one to take responsibility for a complicated solution, a solution that involves action, not only by teenagers, but also by parents and teachers. Even Anna Quindlen, a proponent of condom distribution, acknowledges another, deeper issue that lies beneath the condom distribution debate. In her essay entitle "A Pyrrhic Victory," Quindlen emphasizes, "This isn't really about condoms, of course, but about control and the shock of adolescent sexuality and the difficulty parents have communicating with their kids " (432). Lack of open communication and understanding existing between the majority of teenagers and their parents, Quindlen says, is the true culprit in the search for reasons behind the increase in teenage sexual intercourse today.

Powell. 000+ term papers. and should condoms be distributed in public high schools Philly Globally
Should condom be distributed in high school | Vivere …

Condoms should be distributed in schools essays


Leo is correct when he states that girls are struggling to "say no" in today's society. I believe the reason I was able to "say no" was due to the strong support of my family and friends. If they lack that support and source of love, many girls may agree to have sexual intercourse with their partners. The reason is not their "raging hormones," but their desire to hold onto what they see as the one source of love in their lives. For this reason, I understand why programs that promote the teaching of concepts like self-esteem, self-assertiveness, and the need to protect girls from boys are more effective than condom distribution. Rush Limbaugh's article, "Condoms: The New Diploma," likewise describes the need to protect girls from sexual pressure. Limbaugh nostalgically remembers that "Not so long ago, school policy, including that on many college campuses, was designed to protect the girls from the natural and instinctive aggressive pursuit of young men" (427).
Even though most schools do not distribute condoms, the fact that some do illustrates the changing attitude of schools towards teenage sex. Schools are no longer places that encourage and support girls in their decision to stay abstinent; rather, they have become an environment that promotes the message, "It's okay. We know you are going to have sex. Here is a condom; we just want you to be safe." Even when schools' sex education programs promote abstinence, the provision of condoms defeats the entire message. Limbaugh's essay includes a quotation from Nancy Corwin, a member of the Jacksonville, Florida, school board, who believes that "Schools send a nonsensical message when they teach kids not to have sex but then give them condoms" (428). Not only is condom distribution sending a mixed message to teenage Americans, but also it avoids the true problem. Haven Bradford Gow, in his article "Condom Distribution in High School" argues, "When schools supply children with contraceptives, they simply address the symptoms, rather than the root causes of the problem, which are our popular sexual attitudes and practices" (183).

write my policy paper Distribution Of Condoms In High Schools Essay cambridge history ..

Should condoms be available in high school essay - Exam paper answers


John Leo, a columnist for U.S. News and World Report, reveals hidden solutions to preventing the problems caused by teenage sex. These solutions have remained hidden because they involve directly communicating with American teenagers. Leo's article specifically discusses the opinions of young women about sexual intercourse, motherhood, and self-esteem issues. The title of Leo's article, "Learning to Say No," immediately informs the reader that contrary to most of society's beliefs, teenagers often struggle with their decision to have sexual intercourse. The title implies that "saying no" to sexual intercourse is not as simple as some depict it to be; rather, the ability to refuse needs to be taught as an important component of any sexual education program. Leo explicitly states that the most effective method of preventing teen pregnancies is not distributing condoms, but teaching teenage girls how to refuse sex. The purpose of Leo's argument is to reveal that their partners often pressure young teenage girls into sex. Leo effectively explains the reasons behind this pressure when he says: "Many girls don't want to drift into early sex and early motherhood, but they do. Their problem isn't a shortage of latex products but a lack of sense of self and a lack of social support for abstinence among friends and parents and in our anything-goes sexual culture." Leo's main method of support for his argument is the presentation of statistical information and the citation of credible authorities. For instance, Leo refers to the research of a respected authority by stating, "When Marion Howard, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Emory University, asked more than 1,000 teenage girls in Atlanta what they wanted to learn in sex education, 84 percent of the girls answered 'How to say no without hurting the other person's feelings.' " Just think about the significance of that statistic. It implies that over 80% of teenage girls do not want to have sexual intercourse with their partners. Parents, judges, and school teachers may be correct in assuming that many teenagers today are sexually active, but assuming that all teenagers desire to be sexually active is a whole different story--a story which we do not want to consider, a story that we pretend does not exist.

Condom Use Essay Should Condoms Be Available In High School Essay Economic Essay Kaqy

644 Good Persuasive Topics [Speech or Essay]