Free international relations papers, essays, and research papers.

An update on a similarly named 1998 Foreign Policy article by Stephen Walt. Snyder provides his take on the basic principles of liberalism and compares them to the basic principles of the other major schools of thought in international relations theory. Perfect brief overview of both liberalism and international relations theory in general.

Gender, ‘Race’ and International Relations | Irwin Law

How has the understanding of gender affected the theoretical study of International Relations

Free gender relations Essays and Papers - 123helpme

By the late 1980s, academic scholars in the field of International Relations began to investigate how gender affected International Relations theory and practice.

Seeing Gender in International Security

The module draws from comparative politics, international relations, and political thought to analyse the past, present, and future of the democratic national state, the dominant form of political system in today’s world. It addresses questions such as: Why are some states federal and others unitary? What explains the resilience of nationalism? Does economic integration leads to political disintegration? Why has regional integration gone much further in Europe than elsewhere? Is multi-national democracy possible? The module first charts the emergence of the modern state and its transformation into a national and democratic form of political system. Subsequently, it explores some key aspects of the formation, structuring, restructuring, and termination of states such as the unitary/federal dichotomy, processes of devolution, the challenge of secession, the question of the connections between the economic environment and the number and size of states, the phenomenon of supra-state regional integration, and the connections between nationality and democracy. It concludes by assessing the challenges facing the democratic national state in the 21st century and their likely trajectory in the foreseeable future.

Genest, Marc A. Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. 2d ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2004.
Gender In International Relations Gender and international relations wikigender, ..

Beyond World | its all about International Relations | …

This module is for students on Politics and International Relations MA courses. It offers introduction into writing a postgraduate dissertation, which forms a major assessed element of a Master's course. The dissertation, 12,000-words long, must be on a topic approved by a module convenor, and relevant to the MA programme, for which the individual student is registered. It is conceived as that part of the degree programme where students have considerable leeway to follow their own particular interests with guidance from staff. Supervision of work on the dissertation is concentrated in the second half of the academic year. The module offers a general overview of the dissertation components, and techniques of writing a successful workpiece.

an essay surrounding the question of gender in international relations as well as to

Deirdre McCloskey on Gender Crossing

International relations (IR) theory is difficult to define. It is often taught as a theory that seeks both to explain past state behavior and to predict future state behavior. However, even that definition is contested by many theorists. Traditional IR theories can generally be categorized by their focus either on humans, states, or the state system as the primary source of conflict. Any bibliography of international relations theory is bound to create controversy among its readers. Why did the author choose one theory and not the other? Why did the author choose one source and not the other? Indeed, a wide variety of permutations would be perfectly valid to provide the researcher with an adequate annotated bibliography, so why were these particular entries chosen? This article identifies , , and as the three major branches of IR theory. These three branches have replaced the earlier realism-idealism dichotomy. could be considered part of any of the aforementioned three branches, and its placement in the IR theory world is the subject of some debate. It has therefore been given its own section and is not included in any of the other sections. and are often considered part of constructivism; however, there is much debate over whether they constitute their own branches, and so they are included in this bibliography (as well as in the separate bibliography, ), though the sources are somewhat different. is given its own heading because there are a number of theories that were proposed in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War that are still widely taught and discussed in the field. Perhaps the most controversial inclusion is that of . Though it is quite possible to mount a case for it to be considered a theory of US foreign policy, it is theoretically distinct from other IR theories (the belief in bandwagoning instead of balancing). The final three sections are included to show how political theory has influenced IR theory, and how history and foreign policy have influenced IR theory (and vice versa). The included sections and citations represent both the mainstream of IR theory and those nonmainstream theories that have just started to break into the mainstream of IR theory. This article provides a starting point for both the beginning and the serious scholar of international relations theory.

01/03/2008 · The Norm of Tradition: Gender Subordination and Women's Exclusion in International Relations - Volume 4 Issue 1 - Laura Sjoberg

What Causes Gender Inequality? -- Robert Max Jackson

The overviews listed in this section are generally designed to be introductory international relations (IR) textbooks and not specifically IR theory textbooks. The only article listed in this section is , which is the best source for someone who needs to quickly learn the basics of realism, liberalism, and constructivism. Like Snyder, every source listed herein considers realism, liberalism, and constructivism to be the major IR theoretical frameworks. shows how these three, and other, theories explain and predict the response to crises. examines a wide range of IR theories, but the discussion is limited to the chapters dedicated to IR theory. focuses on the traditional theories, returning to them throughout the book to show how they influence and are impacted by current events. , one of the most widely used undergraduate IR texts, includes sections on how different theories would deal with current international issues. devotes only one chapter to IR theory, but it does the best job of implicitly and explicitly weaving theoretical discussions throughout the text. Of the few widely used textbooks solely devoted to IR theory, is the most comprehensive and the clearest. It makes an ideal textbook for a midlevel or advanced IR theory class in that it goes far beyond the traditional theories, with chapters written by leading experts on the subjects that they cover. and are hybrid textbooks and anthologies. Genest covers a very wide variety of theories, which the author explains through his own writings; he adds classic and modern works to bring the tradition to life. Viotta and Kauppi present a much broader overview, which is most relevant to the undergraduate.