Evidence Appraisal - Essay by Giggles1989 - Anti Essays
Appraisal of Evidence - COLLEGE ESSAY SELLER
1. This essay should be formatted as a scholarly paper. Be sure to begin with a short introductory section to present the overall topic and purpose of the essay, how you will address it, and why it is important to be able to assess a research study.
2. A guideline to assessing quantitative and qualitative articles will provide you with guiding questions to consider as you evaluate the article you have chosen. You can access the guidelines from the electronic learning system. It is important that you critically and systematically appraise all aspects of the chosen article.
3. Based on the article you appraised, consider both the strengths and weaknesses of the article, and discuss the recommendations that could be made in terms of implementing evidence-based clinical practice (EBP).
4. Students are strongly advised to use the Marking Guide as a guide when writing the essay.
5. This essay should be approximately ± 10% of 1800 words, 1.5/double spaced, 1” margins, 12 point font, with 15 scholarly references and using APA referencing. The format follows the research process
Critical appraisal-EBP - Essay Example
Soydan, Haluk, and Lawrence A. Palinkas. 2014. Evidence-based practice in social work: Development of a new professional culture. New York: Routledge.
Linguagem, Cultura e Sociedade | Self …
One commonly used approach is that of the critically appraised topic (CAT) . This was designed to be a one page summary of the evidence related to a particular clinical question. This established method would appear to be a reasonable starting point for developing a clinically based approach to examining the evidence in emergency medicine. Unfortunately problems have been identified. CATs work best when based on papers that stand up to rigorous critical appraisal. In emergency medicine the evidence that does exist is frequently not of high quality, and consequently the critical appraisal process would tend to discard many papers because of either methodological flaws or poor design. The experience of the critical appraisal journal club 3 was that an absolute requirement for high quality evidence meant that large numbers of clinical questions in emergency medicine could not be answered at all. It became apparent during the searches that evidence of lower quality was available, and that this could be assimilated to give the best available answer at the present time.