Actually, the defense attorney's statement is ludicrous.
VAXcomputers running versions of the Berkeley UNIX operating system.
But the proposition that "because you have bought my product and provided me an income, you therefore don't have the right to harm my interests by buying someone else's product instead" is morally vacuous.
who were trying to decompile the worm and understand it.
McCloskey's discussion is also marred by the failure to distinguish between the interests of and , leaving the implication hanging in the air that producers have a right to their living, a moral claim on it, that is only sustained by the consumers who do, or subsequently may not, buy their products.
This virus was released in three shareware programs:David S.
Why the rate of economic growth should have slowed over time is explained by the restrictions that have been put on business and capital, for purposes contrary to Say's Law.
Blumenthal wrote the virus and inserted it in the three programs.
Thus, business e-mail addresses are more likely to be harvested as the automatic targets of e-mail containing malicious programs, such as Melissa, ILOVEYOU, SirCam, Nimda, BadTrans.B, Klez, etc.
that London would be twice as large...
If wages did not rise, then not all of production would be sold, and somebody would go bankrupt with unsold inventory -- though the consumption of labor itself would be unchanged.
Wage levels otherwise are to the welfare of workers -- i.e.
People at businesses probably have their e-mail addresses listed in e-mail address books on many different computers, and also on several webpages; while many people may have their home e-mail addresses in only a few address books of their friends and on no webpage.